Monthly Archives: August 2012

Blatant Disregard/Liberal Media Hide-n-Seek?

Listening to three powerful speeches broadcasting live from the Republican National Convention on PBS for the last couple of days has invigorated me!  Restoring that sense of true hope,  and faith in some real results.  Definitely not the change we have had to endure in the past almost 4yrs.  There is though something that has incited me more so than invigorate and revive my American spirit and that was MSNBC’s RNC coverage on Tuesday, August 28th.

I would like to touch briefly on MSNBC’s blatantly rude decisive move to ignore all the minority speakers’ speeches on Tuesday’s line up, including the rousing and powerful speech of Mia Love. Mia Love is the current Mayor for Saratoga Springs in Utah. Mayor Love is currently running for Representative of Utah’s 4th congressional district. This intelligent, experienced, and successful woman was shunned, as well as Ted Cruz the Senatorial hopeful from Texas, Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval, and even Artur Davis a black former Democrat Representative that has become a Republican was shunned.  What is MSNBC afraid of? Letting their predominately liberal viewers see that there are actually people who share their racial identity, and possibly even have similar family backgrounds as theirs can be conservatives?  That republicans and tea-party members are not all Caucasian, nor men that dress in sheets carrying torches? That conservatives are people just like them that want a better life for all American citizens regardless of gender, race, creed and least of all nationality, is it this truth, which has them cutting to commercials, and commentary during key speeches by those that represent the diversity of the Conservative/Republican party?

We do know this one truth, it bothers some liberals so greatly to see a black conservative, that they had to make malevolent comments on Mia Love’s Wikipedia page calling her a distasteful name and the ever over-used mantra (for any black person that is a conservative) of “uncle tom”.

My two daughters were listening to me on the telephone tonight discussing this matter with a friend (never ceases to amaze me when your children do decide to listen to you), and as soon as I hung up to catch Paul Ryan’s speech (thank goodness for DVR) my youngest asked if what MSNBC did was called ‘Jim Crow’.  Before I could answer her, my oldest daughter responded with, “No silly, that’s called being a media-demagogue!” I had to laugh! Demagogue is her new word from a class she is really enjoying thus far in school this year.

I explained to youngest that Jim Crow laws were rules about black’s freedoms in public and private society that governed what they could and could not do, such as shake hands with a white person, touch a white person, drink from the same water fountains, sit in the same train cars as a white person and so forth. Now the demagogue part was trickier because the verb tense definition of the word could apply in the context that my oldest stated. MSNBC may have inadvertently elicited an emotive bias of the minority conservatives by omitting the broadcast of those speakers, therefore without verbally saying anything implying that they were not worthy of recognition.  This is of course supposition and not an actual known factual statement on the broadcast programming of MSNBC on my part, I can only guess the reasoning as to why these fine civil servants speeches were not broadcasted on that network, Tuesday August 28th.

This just goes to show that all conservatives, and especially those of us that do not fit the mold of what the democrat/liberal media and many members of their party prescribe to as what and how a conservative looks, have to be diligent, speak up, speak out and hold accountable those that try to stifle and hide anything about the truth of our freedom loving, small government, fiscal responsible, faith supporting party.  Will you my friends help keep our values, pride and truths within the forefront of all Americans, and the world?

*Fact of knowledge to share about Jim Crow laws:

Blacks were denied the right to vote by grandfather clauses (laws that restricted the right to vote to people whose ancestors had voted before the Civil War), poll taxes (fees charged to poor blacks), white primaries (only Democrats could vote, only whites could be Democrats), and literacy tests (“Name all the Vice Presidents and Supreme Court Justices throughout America’s history”). Plessy, (Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) case, which legitimized Jim Crow laws and the Jim Crow way of life), sent this message to southern and border states: Discrimination against blacks is acceptable.*1

*1http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/what.htm

OK my people I am about to get real Black on yall. It’s time for some real talk! The power of life and death is in the tongue, Proverbs 18:21, be careful of what power you serve. I sat and I watched the Republican National Convention tonight. I watched Ann Romney and NJ Governor Chris Christy. Those were the only speakers tonight I really wanted to see. Now while watching I also had my browser open knowing that some of us watching would have some interesting comments.

Some of the comments I saw were deeply disturbing. People were making comments about losing their entitlements. People were speaking about entitlement benefits as if they were a right they had earned. Well hold the presses. Let me take yall to school for a minute. The “entitlements” you so want to defend were started as a part of FDR’s New Deal, and for those of you that are already lost FDR stands for Franklin Delano Roosevelt, our 32nd president. The new deal as it was called was a series of handouts to use as a platform to get our Black behinds to vote for him and it worked.

The handouts of the new deal were not meant to help us they were meant to help him. If welfare for example was truly meant to help us it would value traditional marriage and pay benefits equal to a living wage. It does not and it has not.

When you are at home paying your bills and you don’t have enough money do you write a bad check or do you put it off to the side? Eventually you have to stop and look at what you’re doing. If you ain’t got it you can’t spend it! So all that being said why do you expect the government to writing checks? We are taught in Home Economics, to balance a check book, well we used to be, or better yet do you think there is a leprechaun with a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow in Washington waiting to pay for your entitlements?

We need fiscal responsibility and accountability at home and in OUR government! We need a President that understands money and the economy. We need a President that understands you can’t spend more than you have cause eventually somebodies gotta pay the bill. We need a President that understands the balance between what you want to do and what you need to do.

Please don’t get it twisted, I’m Black, I’ve been on welfare. I know what it’s like to have food stamps and need them. I also know from first-hand experience welfare in its current form is NOT what we need. We need to give folks a hand up not a hand out and there is a big difference! We need a President that understands hard work and values it. We as a people need to understand responsibility and accountability.

Here is an excerpt from the book, White Peoples Guide to the Black Community and Get out the Vote http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15764102-white-folks-guide-to-understanding-the-black-community-and-get-out-the

We need Welfare Reform. The current welfare system incentivizes men and women not to be married. In the welfare system, as it is now, women get more support if the father is not around. They are forced to give information on the father, so he can be forced to pay child support. In a lot of cases, that couple is still a couple, and they are trying to see if they can work it out and stay together. That needs to be the other way around. That family needs to get incentives for staying together.

When a couple has a child and stays together that family has a better chance for long term success. That child has the benefit of both parents in the home. They say children learn more from their parents in their first few years on behavior, manners, and morals. They learn their code of conduct at home. With 2 parents in the home, the child has a better chance of becoming a better adjusted member of society. Which costs the taxpayers more, the family stays together, are assigned a life coach, and a stipend to bring them up to the living wage level?

Let’s run the numbers. If a couple is together on welfare and has 2 children, and each works for $8/hr., under this new reform, they would get the following:

1. A life coach                                                $      500(an)

2. Living wage stipend to $14/hr.        $ 23,040 (an)

3. Food stamps                                              $    1,320(an)

4. Section 8 voucher                                   $    6,000(an)

$ 30,860(an)

Couple not together (family of 3)

1        Life coach (2)                          $    500(an)

2        T.A.N.F.                                    $ 5,088(an)

3        Food stamps                           $ 4,200(an)

4        Section 8 voucher                 $16,200(an)

5        Medicaid                                   $14,043(an)

$40,031(an)

As you can see, there is an immediate savings under this reform. You can further incentivize the family by giving them a $1,000 bonus at the end of every year they stay gainfully employed as a requirement of the program. The bonus would be payable at the end of five years in a lump sum.  Also, as they remain employed, their wages will go up and taxpayer will save even more.

We need welfare reform that EVERYONE can benefit from and a President smart enough to do it!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 598 other followers

%d bloggers like this: