Monthly Archives: October 2011
Well, not quite. It’s just Liberals being Liberals. I’m referring to the new “bombshell” story in Politico that “exposes” Herman Cain’s sexual harassment claims from 20 years ago.
Now, if Herman Cain was a liberal Democrat, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the entire race baiting brigade would be yelling from mountain tops, at the top of their lungs… “This is a modern day lynching of a Black man in America. They are only dredging up these lies because he’s Black”. We Conservatives don’t play the race card, soooo… so much for all that! We deal in truth… you know, facts! Fact finding is certainly a method that Politico needs to revisit!
Politico wrote this “damning” story of Herman Cain and then asked Cain for the details! Huh? In what journalistic arena is that appropriate? I’m sorry, but if you write a story for a major news outlet, isn’t it your journalistic duty to provide the facts? Quoting anonymous sources are played out. How long will journalists continue to get away with “sources said”, “according to sources” or “those close to the case said”? Please! Journalism 101: Who, What, When, Where and How. So far, these questions really haven’t been answered by Politico. For now, I will accept Cain’s accounting that he was falsely accused. If Politico wants to actually display outstanding journalistic abilities and actually do some fact finding and point proving, maybe I will reconsider my position.
Here is what I’ve learned from listening to several news reports and commentators. Approximately 20 years ago, Cain supposedly sexually harassed two women when he was CEO of the National Restaurant Association. The information that has come out so far is sketchy, but it seems that Cain, in a ‘non-overtly sexual way” made sexual innuendos and gestures towards these two women. Huh…again? What are non-overtly sexual, sexual innuendos and gestures? That makes me laugh out loud! Supposedly, these two women received five whole figures as a payoff! However, the more I hear; it seems that the so called payoff was more along the lines of severance associated with the accuser’s termination package.
Twenty years ago, I was OVERTLY humped against a file cabinet, had my breast OVERTLY grabbed many times, had my breast and butt accidentally, yet OVERTLY “bumped into”, and endured more OVERTLY sexual comments and innuendos than I can count. I dealt with it by socking one guy in the nose, making it clear those things should never happen again and ignoring guys being guys. Twenty years ago, probably half the men Cain’s age “sexually harassed” someone in ways great and small.
My question is did Cain harass someone yesterday? Last year? Five years ago? Why are we revisiting a settled case from the 1990’s? The answer to that question is simple… it’s a modern day liberal attack of a Black Conservative. It’s a very dangerous thing to let a Black man such as Cain, who is a Conservative, make it into the White House… and Lord forbid he actually gets in there and makes a difference. Blacks just might revisit their Conservative Republican roots and leave the Democrat Plantation. Democrats have enjoyed slavery since the 1800’s… they can’t let their main link to power and fortune slip away now, so they will “lynch” Cain if they can. Not the way they lynched Blacks when they started the Klu Klux Klan… no, no, no… modern day lynchings include smearing a person with lies and half truths and since the mainstream media is incredibly liberal, there will be no journalistic fact finding for whatever allegations are levied against Cain, so the smears will stick… true or not. Most importantly, there will be no so called Black leaders to the rescue! The Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons of the world would never risk their careers in race baiting by defending a Black Conservative. After all, Cain has committed the only sin deemed unforgivable to Black liberals…..he’s a Conservative.
Oh… I almost forgot… that “racist” Rush Limbaugh is defending Cain. No?! I’m laughing out loud again!
Vanessa Anderson- Proud Conservative.
For more blogs from Vanessa Anderson, visit http://followingharriet.blogspot.com/
Visit Color Me Free for Tshirts and other novelties with a Conservative and faith-based message http://colormefree.weebly.com/
The song, “I believe” by Blessed Union of Souls, gave me a jolt of insight today. I was going about my usual cheerful, fun, humorous posting business on social media, when I came across two significant interactive map postings on the sad state of the United States of America by a large media outlet. Instant mood switch to one of sadness, disparity, and yes to be honest hard cold fingers of FEAR raced up and down my body!
Why fear? Because no matter how graphic, chilling or factual the information is..many will continue to not believe!
Why won’t they believe? I can only liken it to a map and explanation I once saw on the History Channel of the Nazi’s march of terror across Germany and Significant parts of Eastern Europe, all while non-Jewish citizens refused to believe of the atrocities that were taking place right under their eyes and noses! Many of those citizens were recorded in the history annuals of saying, “We believed them when they said they were relocating them for their own safety”! Amazing in hindsight what you will believe and accept when even the cold hard truth is right there before your eyes! The logic just isn’t present, and doesn’t exists that people could disappear for days/months/years to never be heard from or seen again! An excellent time line on the History Channel website does a superb job at showing just how quickly in such a short time span a reign of terror can span the map! This poignantly points out how not believing can also be harmful to your survival too; ….”At first few believed, including the Jews themselves, that the rumors of these death camps were real – preferring to believe that they being sent to hard labor camps.” As Elie Wiesel states; “There will be no rest for the wicked, the uncaring or anyone else.” Will you continue to be the “uncaring”?
I believe that those that refuse to accept that liberalism goes against everything they were born under and created to be in God’s image is a sin. We all are sinners, yet we all have God’s given right to seek redemption, to sin no more and by grace be saved. Yet so many Christians do not consider how they cast their vote, (a legal right granted by man) can affect their religious views because they refuse to reconcile the two for their standard of living under God’s laws. For example, how do you reconcile God’s commandment, “Thou shall not steal” with the liberal place that we must literally confiscate another man’s wealth in order to “spread the wealth?” It does not fit. Nor does it fit the Constitution where we are to be equal under the law. But constitution aside, God never said, “oh it’s unfair that your neighbor has more. Go and take it, or choose someone who will do the stealing in your name. No, He said we are to not envy, not steal, not harm one another. But that is exactly what we now do as dictated by the lawless and uncaring actions of some, the immoral is embraced as being the righteous ”man-of-this-earth” laws!
I believe that those that cast their votes for the democrat party and practice liberalism don’t have enough knowledge nor the TRUE correct knowledge of their party’s history. The history of this great nation, the United States of America, and how democrats since the time of their parties conception have enacted laws to degrade, corrupt and cause a racist society. Democrats will swear on a stack of bibles that they are not and do not support hate, racism, and bigotry against any others. Yet based on the premises of the historical and current actions of how that parties leadership as designated to represent you with their legislation, and voting records contradicts your refusal and blatantly disregards any attempts to dispute their race-baiting-hate-monger tactics. Your own democrat history states: ” The Democrats benefited from white Southerners’ resentment of Reconstruction after the war and consequent hostility towards the Republican party. When the Redeemer’s ended Reconstruction in the 1870′s, and the extremely violent disenfranchisement of African-Americans took place in the 1890′s South, voting Democratic, became known as the “Solid South.” What is Solid South? Solid South is, “the electoral support of the Southern United States for the Democrat Party candidates for nearly a century from 1877, the end of Reconstruction to 1964, during the middle of the Civil Rights era. The whole basis for the formation of the Democrat party was due to their disagreement of the formation of the Republican party’s stance of political rights for blacks during reconstruction. For further reading on this information you can go to: http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Democratic_party.aspx#4-1O119:DemocraticParty-full, and of course http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States).
I believe that you don’t love yourself enough if you can prove making unholy concessions in your life by supporting any cause, party or action that willing destroys a life using man-made laws! A life that cannot speak for itself, defend it’s self, and did not ask for conception and yet was conceived. You are a hypocrite if you call yourself a christian and support the democrat party’s beliefs and practices about abortion. Why would I state you don’t love yourself enough? Because any human that values their life and that of others, would cease and desist with supporting anyone and/or anything that advocates that it is okay to abort a baby because it’s your right. What about God’s word? What about adopting out if you cannot afford nor have the wish to raise and support a child? Democrats love the platform of “Planned Parenthood”, and use that platform for every election. Why? Because since the birth of the Real Deal under the guidance of Franklin D. Roosevelt, welfare subsidy programs have always been their top ticket to garnering votes. Planned Parenthood since inception by Margaret Sanger is an evil destructive genocidal bomb that they deploy. Margaret Sanger for the true record was a socialist and an anarchist, one definition of anarchist is as follows: Person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against any established, rule, law, or custom. Sanger is not one to be lauded as a martyr to anyone with firm christian values. Her publication “The Woman Rebel” touted slogans such as; “No God, No Masters”! Sanger believed in “those whose condition is known to be harmful to the stamina of the race, and that sterilization and segregation be applied to those with incurable, hereditary disabilities.” That was in a 1932 essay titled: “A Plan for Peace” that she proposed to a congressional department about population problems. Call it what it is..GENOCIDE! You seeing the correlation yet? Exterminate and thus keep the budget down, sounds harsh doesn’t it? They offer “free” sexual tutoring for neediest of the needy’s children (the influential future), offer free birth-control (inadvertently advocating and supporting premarital sex), offer a list of “low-cost” genocide agents – aka: abortion doctors to eliminate the “accident” that they all along induced with their immoral and corrupt influence!
I believe it is only with taking a long hard look while reflecting on what it is about YOURSELF you love, and what is it about your life YOU love? What does being a christian mean to you? I believe when you can honestly answer those questions and how every decision you make including electing those that will represent Your beliefs as close to and as best as they can to the world. I believe you will have a very difficult time with the correlation of liberalism and Christianity.
That is why my friends I am a conservative, I like to call myself a Christian Conservative.
I believe love is a start…..